Affiliated Groups
Recent Submissions
@Grimmgall's Favorites
@Grimmgall's Friends
Biography
My name’s Robin and I am simply a grotesque creature who lurks the internet. I'm a male and go by masculine pronouns. Located in the United States. Born on July 24, 2002 (20s). I love anthropomorphism, Gothicism, film noir, the paranormal, history, the GI Tract & Ingestion Process, olden society, sexology, psychology, philosophy, and STEAM fields. I aspire to work somewhere in the visual arts or literature industry, preferably as a 2D animator or illustrator. I have a very morbid sense of humor, and can jest about many different topics, despite being sensitive to certain topics.
I consider myself to harbor a melancholic temperament according to several online tests. However, I prefer to allow others to interpret my personality according to their perspectives due to the fact that personalities are usually multi-faceted and how they are interpreted can vary by different people. This is to say that you may interpret me however you wish. Although, I would prefer if you engaged in numerous intimate conversations with me before drawing your own conclusions.
Characters
Latest Journal Entry
Neuralink for Artists?
06 Apr 2024, 11:05 PM
I'm going to be asking this on all sorts of art platforms that do not tolerate AI-generated submissions on-site.
Someone once mentioned the idea of Neuralink for artists on an art website that is notorious for controversial content. It made me think—if Neuralink could allow one to produce an image straight from your mind to a computer screen, drawing program, and/or traditional canvas/paper, how would the art community feel about artists utilizing this tool?
Many people believe that AI can be considered a tool for artists if utilized ethically. There are many uses for AI as a tool for artists to, perhaps, speed up the drawing process, to reference in art, or for other purposes. However, if this tool existed in which you could somehow generate an image directly from your mind and project it somewhere, would you utilize it? Would you condone others utilizing it?
One of the biggest aspects of AI being unethical is that it steals from existing images without permission, does not credit those images and artists, and does not compensate each person and creator affected by this unethical image generation process. However, if Neuralink were to allow you to project an image from your mind in the form of art or a "photograph," therefore eliminating most direct copyright issues aside from cases such as directly mind-copying an existing image or character entirely and taking credit for it, or utilizing it for defamation, revenge erotica, or promoting violence, would it be considered unethical for one to utilize a tool such as this one?
Furthermore, how would a tool like this be utilized via Neuralink? I have no idea how Neuralink functions at the moment, and if it would be able to control your anatomical features such as hands and feet via your mind, but do you believe it would be more like projecting an image on a wall for everyone to see, such as with a projector, being able to upload an image to the internet or to your device from your mind, or would it be more like being able to control your hands to be able to accurately produce an image as you imagine it—being able to control your motor function in order to produce the image you're imagining to the last detail?
Feel free to discuss this in the comments. I'm curious to hear your thoughts since this is an interesting topic for me. If these discussions are disallowed, please notify me, admins, and I will remove this post.
Comments: 2 || Read or Leave Comments